Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202523-3889California822 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDEEP SINGH; RAJBEER No. 23-3889 KAUR; PRABHJOT LNU; SEERAT JEET, Agency Nos.

A240-337-541

Petitioners, A240-337-542

A240-337-543

v.

A240-337-544

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Sandeep Singh, his wife, and two daughters (collectively “Singh”), natives

and citizens of India, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). their requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.