Ushud

Harmony Nason v. Ushud

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202523-35388California1,328 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARMONY NASON, No. 23-35388

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00887-RAJ-BAT v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND MEMORANDUM*

URBAN DEVELOPMENT; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Harmony Nason appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of her

Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review de novo, White v.

Lee, 227 F.3d 1214, 1242 (9th Cir. 2000), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. Nason “must demonstrate standing separately for each form of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.