Ushud
Harmony Nason v. Ushud
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 12, 202523-35388California1,328 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 12 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HARMONY NASON, No. 23-35388
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00887-RAJ-BAT v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND MEMORANDUM*
URBAN DEVELOPMENT; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 12, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Harmony Nason appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of her
Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We review de novo, White v.
Lee, 227 F.3d 1214, 1242 (9th Cir. 2000), and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1. Nason “must demonstrate standing separately for each form of…