Stroj
Stroj v. Brill CA4/3
Opinion
Opinion
Motoike, J.
Filed 3/12/25 Stroj v. Brill CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
ROBERT J. STROJ,
Plaintiff and Appellant, G063834
v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2023- 01342585) MARTIN BRILL et al.,
OPINION
Defendants and Respondents.
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Melissa R. McCormick, Judge. Affirmed. Robert J. Stroj, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Klinedinst, Heather L. Rosing and Amy P. Chambers for Defendant and Respondent Martin Brill. Michel Miller Park, Allen L. Michel and Won M. Park for Defendant and Respondent Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Golubchik L.L.P. Plaintiff and appellant Robert J. Stroj appeals from an order granting special motions to strike under Code…