Stroj

Stroj v. Brill CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 2025G063834California6,189 words

Opinion

Opinion

Motoike, J.

Filed 3/12/25 Stroj v. Brill CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ROBERT J. STROJ,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063834

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2023- 01342585) MARTIN BRILL et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Melissa R. McCormick, Judge. Affirmed. Robert J. Stroj, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Klinedinst, Heather L. Rosing and Amy P. Chambers for Defendant and Respondent Martin Brill. Michel Miller Park, Allen L. Michel and Won M. Park for Defendant and Respondent Levene, Neale, Bender, Yoo & Golubchik L.L.P. Plaintiff and appellant Robert J. Stroj appeals from an order granting special motions to strike under Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.