Daniels

Daniels v. Aponte

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20251:21-cv-03794California218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEREMY DANIELS, Case No. 21-cv-03794-RMI Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. STEVEN APONTE, et al., ll Defendants.

Plaintiff, a former detainee proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 || U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he was improperly arrested and subject to excessive force by police. This case was stayed pursuant to Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 393 (2007), because criminal a 16 || charges were pending against plaintiff related to the underlying incident. Plaintiff could not obtain || money damages related to this incident until the criminal case had ended in his favor or if he was || convicted and the conviction was reversed. Plaintiff has filed a letter indicating that his criminal case is over and he seeks an extension 20 || to lift the stay. Plaintiff's request is granted. Within fifty-six days, plaintiff may file a motion to || lift the stay that also discusses how his criminal ended. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.