Shumate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BENJAMIN T. SHUMATE, Case No. 24-cv-06901-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12 EDDIE ENGRAM, et al., Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, a detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and then an amendment. The court dismissed the complaint and amendment with leave to amend and provided Plaintiff an opportunity to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint (dkt. 8) and then a motion to amend regarding the Defendants (dkt. 9), a motion to supplement the record (dkt. 10), and a motion to appoint counsel (dkt. 11). Plaintiff’s second amended complaint follows some of the instructions set forth by the court in the screening order, but Plaintiff fails to identify many of the specific Defendants and describe how they violated his constitutional rights. Plaintiff’s motion to amend then removes many of the Defendants and seeks to add several unidentified Defendants. The court cannot determine from the…