Werthe

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Werthe

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20253:23-cv-00815California7,747 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 23cv0815-L-DDL

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

Plaintiff, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION v. 14 [ECF No. 26] MATTHEW J. WERTHE dba HSR

WEALTH MANAGEMENT,

16 Defendant.

18 Pending before the Court in this securities fraud action is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). (ECF No. 26.) Defendant Matthew J. Werthe, proceeding pro se, filed an opposition (ECF No. 27) and the SEC replied (ECF No. 28). The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the motion is granted to the extent of Defendant’s liability on the claims alleged in the complaint. / / / / / 27 28 I. BACKGROUND In June 2019, Defendant Matthew J. Werthe started HSR Wealth Management (“HSR”),2 a California-registered investment adviser. Mr. Werthe was the sole owner, employee, and Chief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.