Perez

Perez v. Trax Retail, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20253:24-cv-00333California604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ANA PEREZ, an individual, et al., on Case No.: 24cv333-LL-DDL behalf of herself and all others similarly 9 situated, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE Plaintiffs,

SUR-REPLY

11 v. [ECF No. 51] TRAX RETAIL, INC., a Delaware

corporation and Does 1-50,

Defendants.

16 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Application for Leave to File Sur-Reply in connection with Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration, Dismiss Class Allegations, and Stay PAGA Proceedings. ECF No. 51. The reason for Plaintiffs’ request is because they will purportedly “suffer irreparable harm if they are not allowed to provide additional briefing addressing the arguments presented in Defendants’ Reply regarding the operative Independent Contractor Agreement and the Arbitration Agreement contained therein.” Id. (citing Melmed Decl. ¶ 3). Plaintiffs state that they “timely filed their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.