Principal Life Insurance Company v. The Estate of Sergio Botello Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20251:23-cv-00261California1,151 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:23-cv-00261-KES-CDB

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DEPOSIT INTERPLEADER FUNDS PURSUANT v. TO FED. R CIV. P. 67 14 ESTATE OF SERGIO BOTELLO DIAZ, (Doc. 30) et al.,

Defendants.

Pending before the Court is the application of Interpleader Plaintiff Principal Life Insurance Company (“Principal Life”) for leave to deposit funds pursuant to Rule 67 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed January 28, 2025. (Doc. 30). No party has filed an opposition and because the time to do so has passed, the Court construes the motion is unopposed. See Local Rule 230(c) (“A failure to file a timely opposition may also be construed by the Court as a non-opposition to the motion.”). For the reasons set forth below, Principal Life’s motion will be granted. Background According to the allegations of the complaint, Sergio Botello Diaz (the “Decedent”) was at one time an employee of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.