Angela Madatovian v. Bayer Healthcare LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20252:24-cv-10232California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELA MADATOVIAN, Case No. 2:24-cv-10232-FLA (MAAx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

REMANDED FOR LACK OF

EQUITABLE JURISDICTION

BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC,

15 Defendant. 16

18

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER “In order to entertain a request for equitable relief, a district court must have equitable jurisdiction, which can only exist under federal common law if the plaintiff has no adequate legal remedy.” Guzman v. Polaris Indus. Inc., 49 F.4th 1308, 1313 (9th Cir. 2022) (citations omitted); see also Guar. Tr. Co. of N.Y. v. York, 326 U.S. 99, 105 (1945) (equitable relief in federal courts is “subject to restrictions: the suit must be within the traditional scope of equity as historically evolved in the English Court of Chancery[;] a plain, adequate and complete remedy at law must be wanting[;] explicit Congressional curtailment of equity powers must be respected[; and] the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.