Seret Ishak v. WM Technology, Inc.

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 SERET ISHAK, Case № 2:24-cv-08959-ODW (PVCx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER APPOINTING LEAD

v.

PLAINTIFF AND CLASS COUNSEL

14 WM TECHNOLOGY, INC. et al., [12, 16, 24]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Seret Ishak brings this putative class action for securities fraud under 19 Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Securities 20 Exchange Act”) against Christopher Beals, Arden Lee, Douglas Francis, Susan Echerd, 21 Mary Hoitt, Scott Gordon, William Healy, and Gregory M. Gentile (“Individual 22 Defendants”) and WM Technology, Inc. (“WM”). (Compl., ECF No 1.) Movants Jay 23 Kang, Lawrence M. Jaramillo, and Vanderlei Melchior each seek appointment as lead 24 plaintiff and their respective counsel as lead counsel. (Jaramillo Mot., ECF No. 12; 25 Kang Mot., ECF No. 16; Melchior Mot., ECF No. 24.) 26 27 28 For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Movant Kang’s Motion for 2 Appointment and DENIES Movants …