Andes

(HC) Popke v. Andes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20251:24-cv-00779California415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS LOUIS POPKE, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0779 JLT EPG ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING v. ) UNEXHAUSTED CLAIMS, AND ALLOWING ) PETITIONER TO PROCEED WITH HIS CHANCE ANDES, ) EXHAUSTED CLAIM ) Respondent. ) (Doc. 15) )

Douglas Louis Popke is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, raising three grounds for relief: (1) ineffective assistance of counsel; (2) prosecutorial misconduct; and (3) insufficient evidence to support conviction due to Fourth Amendment violation. (Doc. 1 at 4-5.) The magistrate judge found Petitioner did not exhaust his first two grounds for relief before the California Supreme Court. (Doc. 8; see also Doc. 15 at 2.) Petitioner elected to proceed only with his exhausted ground. (Doc. 13.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court dismiss the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.