Roberts

Roberts v. Eclipz.io, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20255:25-cv-00306California375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PAUL ROBERTS, Case No. 25-cv-00306-VKD

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION Plaintiff, RE AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 v. ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A DISTRICT JUDGE; REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION RE

ECLIPZ.IO, INC., et al., STIPULATION FOR REMAND TO

STATE COURT

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 7,

14 On January 8, 2025, defendant James Rautner removed this action from the Santa Clara County Superior Court, asserting federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 based on plaintiff Paul Roberts’s claim for relief under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961, et seq. Dkt. No. 1. Messrs. Roberts and Rautner1 now stipulate to the filing of an amended complaint that, among other things, disposes of Mr. Roberts’s RICO claim, thereby eliminating the basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.