(SS) L.A.A.A.S. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20252:23-cv-02981California314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 L.A.A.A.S., a minor, No. 2:23-cv-02981-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”). On February 14, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. The deadline has passed, and neither party has filed objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.