(PS) Love v. Tri-Counties Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY LOVE, No. 2:24-cv-01823-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER v. TRI-COUNTIES BANK, Defendant. 16 On February 7, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 16) On February 21, 2025, and February 24, 2025, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF Nos. 17, 19). On February 27, 2025, Defendant filed a reply to Plaintiff’s objections. (ECF No. 19.) The Court has considered these filings in its review of the findings and recommendations. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th…