Volk

Volk v. Bianchi CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2013D061342California2,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcintyre, J.

Filed 7/29/13 Volk v. Bianchi CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CAROLYN VOLK, D061342

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00062522-

CU-PN-NC)

ANTHONY BIANCHI,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Jacqueline M. Stern, Judge. Affirmed.

Iverson, Yoakum, Papiano & Hatch, Neil Papiano and Justin A. Palmer for

Plaintiff and Appellant.

Schmid & Voiles, Denise H. Greer, Robert B. Fessinger and Kyle A. Cruse for

Defendant and Respondent.

Carolyn Volk appeals from a summary judgment in her medical malpractice

action against Dr. Anthony Bianchi. Volk contends the judgment should be reversed because (1) Dr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.