Marriage of Hinton CA2/5

I. INTRODUCTION

Petitioner Kimberly Hinton (Kimberly) appeals from an order denying her request for order (RFO)1 to require her former husband, respondent John Hinton (John), to pay purported arrears in spousal and child support. We affirm.

II. BACKGROUND

A. Prenuptial Agreement

On December 16, 2005, John and Kimberly entered into a prenuptial agreement (Prenuptial Agreement), pursuant to which they agreed their separate assets prior to marriage would remain separate during and after marriage. The parties also agreed that John’s separate property included all of his “income, salary, earnings, bonuses, profits, commissions, distributions, dividends, proprietary interests, stock options, stock splits, accumulations, increases in value, depository receipts, interest income, rental income, or other income generated from separate property of

“In family law proceedings under the Family Code, the term ‘request for order’ (RFO) ‘has the same meaning as the terms ‘motion’ or ‘notice of motion’ when used in the Code of Civil Procedure.’ (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.92(a)(1)(A).)” (In re Marriage of DeWolfe (2023) 93 Cal.App.5th 906, 908, fn. 3.)

2 [John] and/or…