Doe
Doe v. Dwosh CA2/5
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Jane Doe1 appeals from a judgment entered following an order granting defendant’s2 special motion to strike her complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (anti-SLAPP motion).3 She also raises contentions concerning other orders, all but one of which were addressed in our opinion in her prior appeal (the prior appeal).4 As explained below, we construe plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment as taken from the order granting defendant’s request for attorney fees as the prevailing party on the anti-SLAPP motion and affirm that fee award.
Plaintiff filed her complaint and notice of appeal pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 367.3 which authorizes a person who is an active participant in the address confidentiality program (Gov. Code, § 6205 et seq.) to commence an action using a pseudonym. (See § 367.3, subd. (b)(1).)
Defendant is Jack Dwosh, the attorney who represented the petitioner in the underlying domestic violence restraining order proceeding against her.
All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure, unless otherwise indicated.
Doe v. Dwosh (Sept. 9, 2024, B327813) [nonpub.…