Bank of America v. Bailey CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2025D084014California1,778 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 3/14/25 Bank of America v. Bailey CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., D084014

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2021- 00043701-CU-CL-CTL)

WILLIAM R. BAILEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from orders and a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Gregory W. Pollack and Charles E. Bell, Jr., Judges. Affirmed. William R. Bailey, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Nelson & Kennard and Robert Scott Kennard for Plaintiff and Respondent. Bank of America, N.A., sued William R. Bailey to recover unpaid credit card debt. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of Bank. Bailey contends the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.