Kari Lake v. Bill Gates

Good Law
130 F.4th 1054
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202523-16023California4,646 words

Opinion

Opinion

GOULD, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARI LAKE; MARK FINCHEM, No. 23-16023

Plaintiffs, D.C. No. 2:22-cv- 00677-JJT and

ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, Counsel OPINION for Plaintiffs,

Appellant,

v.

BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; THOMAS GALVIN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; STEVE GALLARDO, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,

Defendants-Appellees, and

ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State; MARICOPA COUNTY

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; REX

SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; MATT HEINZ, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; SHARON BRONSON, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; STEVE CHRISTY, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; ADELITA GRIJALVA, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; PIMA

COUNTY BOARD OF

SUPERVISORS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.