Kari Lake v. Bill Gates

Good Law
130 F.4th 1064
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 202523-16022California6,850 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARI LAKE; MARK FINCHEM, No. 23-16022

Plaintiffs, D.C. No. 2:22-cv- and 00677-JJT

ANDREW D. PARKER; PARKER

DANIELS KIBORT, LLC; KURT B. OPINION

OLSEN; OLSEN LAW, PC, Counsel for Plaintiffs,

Appellants, v.

BILL GATES, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; CLINT HICKMAN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; JACK SELLERS, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; THOMAS GALVIN, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors; STEVE GALLARDO, as a member of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors,

Defendants-Appellees, and

ADRIAN FONTES, Arizona Secretary of State; MARICOPA COUNTY

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; REX

SCOTT, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; MATT HEINZ, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; SHARON BRONSON, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; STEVE CHRISTY, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; ADELITA GRIJALVA, as a member of the Pima County Board of Supervisors; PIMA

COUNTY BOARD…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.