People v. Nnedum CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2025C100208California1,963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/14/25 P. v. Nnedum CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100208

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 62-172434)

v.

PETER CHIDUMEBI NNEDUM,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Peter Chidumebi Nnedum asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We will affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Nnedum was charged with committing in March 2020 first degree residential burglary of an inhabited dwelling (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 667.5, subd. (c)(21);1 count one)

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 and felony unlawful use of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.