Hyatt

People v. Hyatt

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 14, 2025G063126California6,880 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On November 5, 2019, the District Attorney filed a complaint alleging Hyatt had violated section 245, subdivision (a)(4), felony assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury. The complaint also alleged Hyatt had suffered two prior serious and violent felony convictions in 2004 and 2014. On December 5, 2019, Hyatt pleaded not guilty and denied the allegations.

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2 On August 12, 2022, Hyatt was sentenced to a term of six years in state prison in an unrelated case and was taken into custody by the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department pending transport to the California 2 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). On the same day Hyatt was taken into custody to begin serving his prison sentence in that case, Hyatt’s attorney prepared the section 1381 demand in this case and had it personally served on the District Attorney and the clerk of the Orange 3 County Superior Court. The section 1381 demand was set forth on pleading paper and directed to the District Attorney. The caption included the case number of the complaint the District Attorney had filed against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.