Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
130 F.4th 1142
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202523-1247California7,848 words

Opinion

Opinion

VANDYKE, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GURPARAS SINGH, No. 23-1247

Petitioner, Agency No.

A216-276-598

v.

PAMELA BONDI *, Attorney General, OPINION

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 22, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed March 17, 2025

Before: Daniel A. Bress and Lawrence VanDyke, Circuit Judges, and Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge. **

* Pamela Bondi is substituted for her predecessor, Merrick Garland, as Attorney General, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c). ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, Senior United States District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. Opinion by Judge VanDyke; Concurrence by Judge Bress

SUMMARY ***

Immigration

The panel denied Gurparas Singh’s petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the denial of asylum and related relief and protection, concluding that substantial evidence supported the BIA’s determination that Singh…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.