Kamal

Kamal v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego, Et

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202524-5958California881 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-5958 D.C. No. IN RE: YOUSSIF KAMAL, GILLIAN 18-cv-1298

NEELY, RICHARD LICHTEN, SUSAN

COX, NICK TOVAR, MICHELE MEMORANDUM*

KINMAN, ASHLEY PETEFISH.

__________________________________

YOUSSIF KAMAL, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; GILLIAN NEELY, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; RICHARD LICHTEN, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; SUSAN COX, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; NICK TOVAR, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MICHELE KINMAN, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; ASHLEY PETEFISH, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Petitioners,

v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.