Jesse Skinner v. R. Lee
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202522-55146California525 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESSE M. SKINNER, No. 22-55146 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:19-cv-01116 v.
MEMORANDUM*
R. LEE, et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 6, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: TALLMAN, IKUTA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Appellant Jesse Skinner, a federal inmate, appeals the dismissal of his Third
Amended Complaint for failure to comply with Rule 8 and failure to state a claim.
Skinner’s counseled briefs on appeal challenge the dismissal of his Eighth
Amendment excessive force claim alleging that federal corrections officers abused
and harassed Skinner and then retaliated against him for filing grievances. Skinner
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. concedes, however, that his argument on appeal is foreclosed by…