Carol Wassmann v. South Orange County Community College District

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 17, 202523-55671California558 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 17 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAROL ELAINE WASSMANN, No. 23-55671

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:23-cv-00119-DOC-KES v.

SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY MEMORANDUM*

COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT;

KARIMA FELDHUS; ROBERT

BRUMUCCI; GLENN ROQUEMORE;

LEWIS LONG; KATHERINE

SCHMEIDLER; DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Carol E. Wassmann appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment dismissing her complaint with prejudice and without leave to

amend. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.