People v. Tranum CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 2025E082901California3,826 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In January 2018, defendant pled guilty to first degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459)

and a misdemeanor charge of possessing an opium pipe (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364).

He admitted two prior convictions that qualified both as serious felonies (Pen. Code, §

667, subd. (a)) and prior strikes (Pen. Code, § 667, subd. (b)(1)). He also admitted three

prison prior convictions (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b). The court granted defendant’s

motion to strike one of the prior strikes, but “only for the purposes of the [T]hree

[S]trikes sentencing law,” leaving the admission intact “for all other sentencing purposes,

including the [Penal Code section] 667[ subdivision ](a) prior, which is going to be

imposed.” The court sentenced defendant to an aggregate term of 18 years in prison. In

doing so, the court imposed but immediately struck one-year enhancement terms for each

of defendant’s three prison priors.

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.

2 In December 2023, the trial court reviewed defendant’s eligibility for recall and

resentencing under section 1172.75. The court noted on the record that it considered the

following…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.