People v. Garza CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 2025B332122California1,529 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 3/17/25 P. v. Garza CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B332122 (Super. Ct. No. 2016019312) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)

v.

JAIME GARZA,

Defendant and Appellant.

Jaime Garza appeals from the judgment after he pleaded guilty to felony oral copulation with the use of an intoxicant or controlled substance (Pen. Code,1 former § 288a, subd. (i)) and misdemeanor sexual battery (§ 243.4, subd. (e)(1)), and admitted that he had suffered 18 prior strike convictions (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)). The trial court struck 17 of the prior strikes (see People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497, 529-530) and sentenced him to 12 years…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.