Cahill

Cahill v. Nike, Inc.

Good Law
131 F.4th 933
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202524-2199California3,272 words

Opinion

Opinion

VanDyke, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELLY CAHILL; HEATHER No. 24-2199

HENDER; SARA JOHNSTON;

LINDSAY ELIZABETH, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01477-JR Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v. OPINION

INSIDER INC.; ADVANCE LOCAL

MEDIA LLC d/b/a/ OREGONIAN

MEDIA GROUP; AMERICAN

CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS,

Intervenors - Appellees,

NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation,

Defendant – Appellant,

----------------------------------------

MARKOWITZ HERBOLD, PC,

Intervenor.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Senior District Judge, Presiding CAHILL V. NIKE, INC.

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2025 San Francisco, California

Filed March 18, 2025

Before: Lawrence VanDyke and Anthony D. Johnstone, Circuit Judges, and Dana L. Christensen, District Judge. *

Opinion by Judge VanDyke

SUMMARY **

Confidential Documents

The panel: (1) vacated the district court’s order denying a motion to require a media organization to return or destroy confidential documents that were inadvertently disclosed to it by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.