Cahill
Cahill v. Nike, Inc.
131 F.4th 933
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202524-2199California3,272 words
Opinion
Opinion
VanDyke, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KELLY CAHILL; HEATHER No. 24-2199
HENDER; SARA JOHNSTON;
LINDSAY ELIZABETH, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01477-JR Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v. OPINION
INSIDER INC.; ADVANCE LOCAL
MEDIA LLC d/b/a/ OREGONIAN
MEDIA GROUP; AMERICAN
CITY BUSINESS JOURNALS,
Intervenors - Appellees,
NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation,
Defendant – Appellant,
----------------------------------------
MARKOWITZ HERBOLD, PC,
Intervenor.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Senior District Judge, Presiding CAHILL V. NIKE, INC.
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2025 San Francisco, California
Filed March 18, 2025
Before: Lawrence VanDyke and Anthony D. Johnstone, Circuit Judges, and Dana L. Christensen, District Judge. *
Opinion by Judge VanDyke
SUMMARY **
Confidential Documents
The panel: (1) vacated the district court’s order denying a motion to require a media organization to return or destroy confidential documents that were inadvertently disclosed to it by…