Cahill

Cahill v. Nike, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202524-165California1,045 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELLY CAHILL, et al., No. 24-165 D.C. No. Plaintiffs – Appellees, 3:18-cv-01477-JR v.

MEMORANDUM*

NON-PARTY MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS

INSIDER INC. d/b/a BUSINESS INSIDER; ADVANCE LOCAL MEDIA LLC d/b/a/ OREGONIAN MEDIA GROUP; and

AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS

JOURNAL, INC. d/b/a PORTLAND

BUSINESS JOURNAL,

Intervenors – Appellees,

and

NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2025 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: VANDYKE and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge. **

Defendant Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) appeals from the district court’s order

unsealing certain documents that were attached as exhibits to Plaintiffs’ motion for

class certification in a gender…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.