Cahill
Cahill v. Nike, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KELLY CAHILL, et al., No. 24-165 D.C. No. Plaintiffs – Appellees, 3:18-cv-01477-JR v.
MEMORANDUM*
NON-PARTY MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS
INSIDER INC. d/b/a BUSINESS INSIDER; ADVANCE LOCAL MEDIA LLC d/b/a/ OREGONIAN MEDIA GROUP; and
AMERICAN CITY BUSINESS
JOURNAL, INC. d/b/a PORTLAND
BUSINESS JOURNAL,
Intervenors – Appellees,
and
NIKE, INC., an Oregon Corporation,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 12, 2025 San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: VANDYKE and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge. **
Defendant Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) appeals from the district court’s order
unsealing certain documents that were attached as exhibits to Plaintiffs’ motion for
class certification in a gender…