Pedro Mejia Tovar v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
534 F. App'x 679
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 201312-73005California364 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Pedro Mejia Tovar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Lim v. INS, 224 F.3d 929, 933 (9th Cir.2000), and we review de novo due process claims, Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

Mejia Tovar does not challenge the agency’s dispositive finding that his application for asylum was untimely.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Mejia Tovar failed to establish past persecution based on the threats he received, the shooting incident, and the incident with the grenade. See Lim, 224 F.3d at 936 ; Hoxha v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2003) (petitioner failed to present evidence that compelled a finding of past persecution). Substantial evidence also supports the finding that Mejia Tovar failed to demonstrate a clear probability of future harm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.