People v. Murray CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2025F087699California1,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/18/25 P. v. Murray CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F087699

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. LF013543A) v.

DUSTIN MURRAY, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT*

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Brian M. McNamara, Judge. Francine R. Tone, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

* Before Peña, Acting P. J., Meehan, J. and Snauffer, J. Defendant and appellant Dustin Murray was found guilty by a jury of attempted burglary, petty theft, and witness dissuasion. The trial court sentenced defendant to 13 years in prison.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.