Gupta

Gupta v. Mercedes-Benz USA CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2025B333900California2,343 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/18/25 Gupta v. Mercedes-Benz USA CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

AMIT GUPTA, 2d Civil No. B333900 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2020- Plaintiff and Appellant, 00544715-CU-BC-VTA) (Ventura County) v.

MERCEDES-BENZ USA,

LLC, et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Amit Gupta appeals from the judgment entered after an arbitrator issued an award in defendants’ favor. Gupta challenges the trial court’s order granting Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC’s (MBUSA) motion to compel arbitration of his claims for violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (Song- Beverly Act) (Civ. Code, §1790 et seq.) due to an alleged defective ventilation system in his 2018 Mercedes-Benz GLS.1 The trial court concluded MBUSA was a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.