Singh
Singh v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202524-2995California1,007 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GURJEET SINGH; NARENDRA No. 24-2995 KAUR; NAVREET KAUR, Agency Nos.
A220-721-705
Petitioners, A220-940-686
A220-940-687
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 7, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Gurjeet Singh (“Singh”), Narendra Kaur, and their minor child (collectively,
“Petitioners”), all natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the decision
of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their application for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).…