Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202524-2995California1,007 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GURJEET SINGH; NARENDRA No. 24-2995 KAUR; NAVREET KAUR, Agency Nos.

A220-721-705

Petitioners, A220-940-686

A220-940-687

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 7, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Gurjeet Singh (“Singh”), Narendra Kaur, and their minor child (collectively,

“Petitioners”), all natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the decision

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.