Bondi
Ruano Corado De Gudiel v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202524-2159California723 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KARLA RUANO CORADO DE GUDIEL; No. 24-2159 et al., Agency Nos.
A220-988-892
Petitioners, A220-988-893
A220-988-894
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 3, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Petitioners Karla Ruano Corado de Gudiel (“Ruano Corado”) and her two
minor children, all natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of a
decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the denial by an
immigration judge (“IJ”) of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…