Bondi

Ruano Corado De Gudiel v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202524-2159California723 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARLA RUANO CORADO DE GUDIEL; No. 24-2159 et al., Agency Nos.

A220-988-892

Petitioners, A220-988-893

A220-988-894

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Karla Ruano Corado de Gudiel (“Ruano Corado”) and her two

minor children, all natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of a

decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the denial by an

immigration judge (“IJ”) of their applications for asylum, withholding of removal,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.