Boyko

Boyko v. Barizon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 202524-2888California736 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 18 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: MARK STEVEN BOYKO No. 24-2888 D.C. No. Debtor 23-1139 ____________________________

MEMORANDUM*

MARK STEVEN BOYKO,

Appellant.

v.

AUGUST BARIZON; SARA

BOROUMAND,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Scott H. Gan, Robert J. Faris, and Gary A. Spraker, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted March 6, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mark Steven Boyko (“Boyko”) appeals a decision by the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming a bankruptcy court’s

nondischargeable judgment in favor of creditors August Barizon and Sara

Boroumand (collectively “Appellees”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.