People v. Soto CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 2025C101448California2,107 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eurie, J.

Filed 3/18/25 P. v. Soto CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE, C101448

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 22CF03465, 24CF01529, 24CF01926) v.

RICARDO ANTONIO SOTO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Ricardo Antonio Soto appeals the trial court’s judgment sentencing him to an aggregate sentence of three years eight months. He complains the trial court abused its discretion: (1) in failing to recognize his posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a supermitigating factor requiring express findings under Penal Code1 section 1170,

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 subdivision (b)(6); and (2) otherwise failing to consider factors in mitigation. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.