People v. Miles CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant Jerry Miles was resentenced pursuant to Penal Code1
section 1172.75. On appeal, he contends that: (1) the trial court improperly imposed a
$5000 fine under section 294; (2) the order to pay the costs of a presentence report must
be stricken from the amended abstract of judgment, since the court did not make that
order; (3) if the court did make that order, Assembly Bill No. 1869 now requires that it be
stricken from the judgment; and (4) his custody credits were improperly recalculated.
We agree that the order to pay for the presentence report must be stricken. Otherwise, we
affirm the judgment.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2010, a jury found defendant guilty of one count of rape of a child under
years of age (§ 269, subd. (a)(1)) and three counts of simple battery (§ 242). (People v.
Miles (June 18, 2012, E052647 [nonpub. opn.] (Miles).).2 The trial court found true that
defendant had served one prior prison term (§ 667.5, subd. (b)) and that he had nine prior
strike convictions (§§ 667, subds. (c) & (e)(2)(A) and 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)(A).) (Ibid.)