Seneca
Seneca v. Homeaglow Inc
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 202524-887California1,303 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 19 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SETH SENECA; LISA ANDOH, No. 24-887 individually on behalf of themselves and all D.C. No. others similarly situated, 8:23-cv-02308-CJC-ADS Plaintiffs - Appellees,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
HOMEAGLOW INC., a Delaware corporation doing business as Dazzling Cleaning,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 3, 2025 Pasadena, California
Before: SANCHEZ and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and LIBURDI, District Judge.**
Homeaglow Inc. appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to compel
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Michael T. Liburdi, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. arbitration. The district court found that Homeaglow did not present its “Terms…