People v. Navarro CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2025H051272California1,705 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/19/25 P. v. Navarro CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H051272

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. Nos. F1556292 &

F1557826)

v.

CESAR ARMANDO NAVARRO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Cesar Armando Navarro1 sought resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.75.2 This statute provides for resentencing in eligible cases in which a prior prison term enhancement under former section 667.5, subdivision (b) was imposed before January 1, 2020. The trial court denied resentencing, reasoning that Navarro was not eligible for resentencing because the punishment for his prior prison term enhancements was stricken. The trial court thus concluded that these enhancements were not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.