Legaspi

Legaspi v. Spivak CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2013B240274California5,625 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manella, J.

Filed 7/30/13 Legaspi v. Spivak CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

TODD LEGASPI et al., B240274 (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Respondents, Super. Ct. No. BC469228)

v.

KENIN M. SPIVAK et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles, William F. Highberger, Judge. Affirmed. SML, Kenin M. Spivak and Theodore Maloney; Brookstone Law, Vito Torchia, Jr. and Sasan Behnood for Defendants and Appellants SML LLP, Edwin

I. Lasman, Theodore Maloney, Kenin M. Spivak, Brookstone Law, Vito Torchia,

Jr. and Damian Kutzner. No appearance for Plaintiffs and Respondents Todd Legaspi et al. In the underlying action, the plaintiffs asserted claims against several…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.