In re T.A. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2013A136820California2,573 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

Filed 7/30/13 In re T.A. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re T.A. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

ALAMEDA COUNTY SOCIAL

SERVICES AGENCY,

A136820

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Alameda County Super. Ct. Nos. HJ08011104, HJ08011105)

ANDREA H.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Andrea H. (mother) appeals from an order terminating her parental rights and selecting adoption as the permanent plan for two of her daughters. Mother contends the evidence is insufficient to support the court’s finding that the beneficial parent-child relationship exception to adoption is inapplicable. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).)1 We find no error and shall affirm. Factual and Procedural Background On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.