Maniago

Maniago v. Desert Cardiology Consultants' Medical Group

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 19, 2025D085025MCalifornia4,336 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

Filed 2/26/25 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN MANIAGO et al., D085025

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. CVRI2303683)

v.

DESERT CARDIOLOGY ORDER MODIFYING

CONSULTANTS’ MEDICAL GROUP, OPINION AND DENYING

INC., et al., REHEARING

Defendants and Respondents. NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 30, 2025, be modified as follows: On page 12, insert “(Meinhardt)” after the Meinhardt citation. On page 14, at the end of the last paragraph immediately before the Disposition, insert footnote 3 as follows: In a petition for rehearing, the Maniagos argue that our ruling conflicts with language from the Supreme Court’s decision in Meinhardt and the holding of Miles v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 394. They are mistaken. The Meinhardt language cited by the Maniagos merely recognized that reviewing courts may in some circumstances deem orders to be appealable without a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.