People v. Marshall CA1/3

Filed 3/19/25 P. v. Marshall CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A167770

v. REGINA MARIE MARSHALL, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 20- SF-003150-A) Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Regina Marshall guilty of three counts of altering or issuing an altered narcotics prescription in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11368. Defendant raises three claims of error on appeal: (1) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of her statements that police coerced with a promise of leniency; (2) she was wrongly convicted of two counts of forgery based on one prescription; and (3) the court failed to conduct a hearing pursuant to People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden). We…