Aerotek

Aerotek v. Johnson Group Staffing CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2013C067652California6,065 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/30/13 Aerotek v. Johnson Group Staffing CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

AEROTEK, INC.,

Plaintiff and Appellant, C067652

v. (Super. Ct. No. 34200700540602CUBTGDS)

THE JOHNSON GROUP STAFFING

COMPANY, INC. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Here, we consider whether a former employee’s announcement of his new employment by telephone and in person with former employer’s customers constitutes a solicitation in violation of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) (Civ. Code, § 3426 et seq.).1 This case involves two companies that compete in the staffing industry to locate, screen, and place employees in temporary and permanent job positions with client firms. Aerotek,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.