International Medical Devices, Inc. v. Robert Cornell

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20252:20-cv-03503California5,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

International Medical Devices, et al, Case No.: 2:20-cv-03503-CBM (RAOx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A Robert Cornell, MD, an individual, et MATTER OF LAW AND FOR NEW al, TRIAL

Defendants.

16 The matter before the Court is Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for New Trial. (Dkt. No. 716 (“Motion”).) I. BACKGROUND This is a trade secrets case filed by Plaintiffs International Medical Devices, Inc., Menova International, Inc., and James Elist, MD against multiple Defendants.1 (Dkt. No. 578.) The parties are familiar with the factual and procedural background of the case; therefore, the Court does not repeat the relevant facts herein. On June

1 Defendants are Robert Cornell, MD; Augmenta, LLC; Robert J. Cornell M.D., P.A.; Jonathan Clavell Hernandez, MD; Clavell Urology, PLLC; OAM …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.