Wynne

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3D SYSTEMS, INC., Case No.: 21-cv-1141-AGS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

v. SEAL (ECF 485, 490, 507, 510, 516, 518, 520, 528, 540, 543, 547, 560, 579, Ben WYNNE, et al., 582, 586, 590, 592, 601, 604, 618, 624) Defendants. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

9 The parties move to seal many exhibits to their motions for summary judgment, to 10 exclude experts, and for other potentially dispositive relief. To “seal judicial records 11 attached to a dispositive motion,” the moving party “must articulate compelling reasons 12 supported by specific factual findings that outweigh the general history of access and the 13 public policies favoring disclosure.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 14 1172, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2006) (cleaned up). This rule applies “even if the dispositive 15 motion, or its attachments, were previously filed under seal or protective order.” Id. 16 at 1179. It also pertains to motions that “may be effectively dispositive of a motion…