Devin Augustine v. Sugar Foods Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20252:23-cv-07950California507 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL □□□□

Case No. = 2::23-cv-7950-CBM-JPRx Date March 14, 2025 Title Augustine v. Sugar Foods Corp.

Present: The Honorable © CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

V.R. VALLERY NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

NONE PRESENT NONE PRESENT

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

The matter before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 41 (the “Motion”).) Defendant moves to dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) as to Plaintiff's unlawful wage deduction, sick leave, expense reimbursement, rest periods, and minimum wage claims. However, Plaintiff does not assert an unlawful wage deduction claim or sick leave claim in the TAC. Therefore, there are no unlawful wage deduction or sick leave claims subject to dismissal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.