Ralon
Ralon v. Kaiser Permanente Hospital
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DOMITILA PELAEZ RALON,
Case No. 23-cv-03344-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, SANCTIONS
INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 77 Defendants.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (collectively, “Kaiser”) bring a Motion for Issue and Evidentiary Sanctions for Failure to Respond to Written Discovery and Comply with Court Orders (“Motion”). The Court finds that the Motion is suitable for determination without oral argument. See Civ.L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.1 II. BACKGROUND At a Case Management Conference held on September 18, 2024, Plaintiff, on the record, gave “her verbal authorization for Kaiser’s counsel, Justin Sha, to review her medical records from 2020 to present and produce copies of the…