Barry S. Steinhardt v. Blue Cross of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20253:23-cv-01737California2,269 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 BARRY S. STEINHARDT, an individual, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01737-L-KSC on behalf of himself, all others similarly 13 situated, and the general public, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER Plaintiff,

GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

15 v. [ECF No. 34] BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 17 Defendants.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Barry S. Steinhardt’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to set aside judgement as void under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4), or alternatively, for excusable neglect under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1).1 (ECF. No. 34.) Defendants collectively opposed the motion, and Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 40, 42.) For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. / / / / / 25 26 27 28 1 I. Background This putative class action alleging negligent misrepresentation, unfair competition, and breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing was filed in the Los…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.